{
  "number": 1,
  "title": "Main, Water and West Water signal review",
  "category": "Draft request",
  "status": "Draft prepared; not submitted",
  "revision": 2,
  "revisionDate": "2026-10-18",
  "submittedDate": null,
  "topicId": "water-main",
  "scope": "Review separate signal phases for Water Street and West Water Street at Main Street, allowing one approach to move while the opposite approach waits, including left turns and through traffic. Review adjusted timing and reported low throughput per cycle while maintaining safe pedestrian crossings.",
  "records": [],
  "related": [
    4
  ],
  "source": "Facebook comments in IMG_9038, IMG_9043, IMG_9044, IMG_9045 and IMG_9050. Clarification reviewed October 18 in IMG_9102, IMG_9103 and IMG_9104: Lizzie Pugatch explains separate periods for the opposing approaches; Svetlana Rojevsky explicitly agrees and includes left turns and through traffic. Other named commenters are credited for their own observations, not blanket endorsement of this revision.",
  "history": [
    {
      "date": "2026-10-17",
      "event": "Revision 1 assigned to the prepared request. No submission recorded."
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-10-18",
      "event": "Revision 2 clarifies the request for separate Water and West Water signal phases and adjusted timing, based on Lizzie Pugatch’s explanation and Svetlana Rojevsky’s agreement. Revision 1 is preserved. Draft remains unsubmitted while further feedback is gathered."
    }
  ],
  "requestText": "Please review separate signal phases for Water Street and West Water Street at Main Street, allowing one approach to move while the opposite approach waits. Residents report that left turns hold up drivers going straight and that too few cars get through each light cycle. Please review whether separate phases and adjusted timing could improve traffic flow while maintaining safe pedestrian crossings.",
  "reference": "CM Traffic 2026/001",
  "assignedDate": "2026-10-17"
}